Articles on Google by:
Yakubu, A. S.*
Muhammad, U. U.
Abubakar, A. A.
Oviawe, E. I.
Abubakar, N.
Bodinga, H. A.
Original Research Article
Evaluation of the closure of cystotomy using single versus double row inverting suture pattern with chromic catgut in Nigerian indigenous dogs
|
|
|
|
|
|
Article Number: DRJVMS36901278
DOI: https://doi.org/10.26765/DRJVMS36901278
ISSN: 2734-2166
Vol. 5 (2), pp. 8-13, March 2020
Copyright © 2020
Author(s) retain the copyright of this article
Abstract
In this study, we evaluated a watertight seal using a single row and double row techniques for the closure of cystotomy in dogs. Eight apparently healthy, Nigerian local dogs weighing between 9-17 kg body weights were used in the study. The dogs were divided into two groups (A and B), each group comprises of 4 dogs of both sexes. Cystotomy incision was made on the dorsal wall of the urinary bladder in both groups. In group A the cystotomy incision was closed with a single row suture pattern and in group B the incision was closed with a double-row technique using chromic catgut size 2/0 in both groups. The single and double row closure techniques were evaluated for leakage through physical evaluation and contrast radiography using Urografin 76% contrast agent. Radiographs were taken immediately and one week postoperative. The physical evaluation revealed evidence of leakage in 25% of the dogs from group B 3 days postoperative. There was no hematuria in all the groups. Anorexia was observed in 50% of dogs from all the groups. Dysuria was also observed in 25% of dogs from all groups. There was vomiting in 100% dogs of group A and 25% dogs of group B. Tachypnea was also observed in 50% dogs of group B. The radiographic evaluation revealed 100% urine seal immediately after the surgery in all experimental animals. One week postoperative radiograph shows urine leakage in group B1b. It was concluded that double-row techniques is more efficient than single row technique in cystotomy closure in dogs.
Keywords: Cystotomy, double-row techniques, tachypnea, dogs, radiographyReceived: March 7, 2020 Accepted: March 25, 2020 Published: March 30, 2020